One may think about my nephew and Ms. Riitta-Berliner-Mauer as opposing instances.?
In the beginning, objects must evince features signaling humanness—faces, mouths, voices—to be looked at animate; in objectophilia, the item is sexy correctly since it is perhaps not human being, perhaps not soft and packed with fluids, but instead difficult, difficult, hard—though also a little porous.
But both situations are about things arriving at a life that is new regards to their counterparties—subjects, individuals, wetware. Nevertheless, both are about subjects engaging with objects, whoever status that is new simply caused by them by the former. The new charm of things is rooted in their being seen as things, which begins when they are no longer objects for subjects in Jane Bennett’s view, by contrast. 4 They then become available not just for animist animation and desire that is sexual also for a 3rd connection: as items of recognition, as avenues toward what exactly is fundamentally a de-animation, a type of de-subjectivation or critical problem of subjectivation. Hito Steyerl might have had something similar to this at heart whenever she had written in e-flux journal:
Typically, emancipatory training happens to be associated with a want to be an interest. Emancipation had been conceived as becoming an interest of history, of representation, or of politics. To be an interest carried with it the vow of autonomy, sovereignty, agency.
Devamını Oku